· marketing · 9 min read
5 Controversial Crazy Egg Tips That Might Divide Marketers
Five unconventional Crazy Egg approaches that challenge common CRO wisdom - radical cuts, purposeful friction, gamified nudges, persona-based omission, and hiding information - with implementation steps, measurement plans, and ethical checks.

Outcome first: read this and you’ll have five practical, testable Crazy Egg experiments you can run this week that may increase conversions - or prove why conventional wisdom survives. Some of these will make you uncomfortable. Good. Discomfort means you’re testing real trade-offs.
Why this matters now
Heatmaps and session recordings make hidden visitor behavior visible. That visibility creates temptation: to cut, nudge, hide or gamify. Those moves can lift short-term conversions. They can also hollow out trust. This post gives five controversial ways marketers are using Crazy Egg to push boundaries, and - equally important - how to implement them safely and measure whether they’re worth keeping.
How to read this
Each tip follows the same pattern: quick summary, why it’s controversial, step-by-step Crazy Egg implementation, how to measure it, pros and cons, and privacy or ethical considerations.
Sources and tools I reference: Crazy Egg features and docs (https://www.crazyegg.com/features/), the GDPR primer (https://gdpr.eu/), and an A/B sample-size calculator (https://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/sample-size.html).
Tip 1 - Radical Reduction: Remove high-interaction elements that don’t convert
The idea in one line: if a section gets lots of clicks but zero conversions, cut it.
Why marketers argue about it
Conventional UX says give users helpful content and choices. The radical approach trades perceived helpfulness for focus: remove distractions so the user sees only the path you want them to take. Some call this ruthless optimization; others call it short-termism.
How to run it in Crazy Egg
- Create heatmap snapshots of the target page and overlay scroll maps to spot high-interaction, low-value elements.
- Use recordings to confirm the behavior (people interact but don’t convert afterward).
- Clone the page and remove or replace the target element(s). If you don’t have server-side cloning capabilities, hide elements with a temporary CSS rule in your test variant (e.g., .promo-banner {display:none}).
- Run both pages as an A/B test (Crazy Egg integrates with many A/B testing tools or you can use your own redirect split).
How to measure
- Primary metric - conversion rate (same definition as your business - signups, purchases, leads).
- Secondary metrics - bounce rate, time on page, pages per session, revenue per visitor.
- Use a sample-size calculator before deciding. For reliable results, target the sample sizes recommended by statistical calculators.
Pros
- Simplest change with high potential upside.
- Fast to test and rollback.
Cons
- Risk of removing persuasive copy that nurtures long-term trust.
- You might increase short-term conversions at the cost of higher churn.
Ethics & UX
Document the decision and re-test the variant after a longer period (30–90 days) to ensure retention and customer satisfaction aren’t harmed.
Example
A SaaS company removes an FAQ accordion that attracted many clicks but rarely led to trials. Conversions rose 12% in the first two weeks - but churn increased among a specific cohort that later reported unmet expectations. The company restored a condensed FAQ and used a contextual help widget for those who needed it.
Tip 2 - Add friction intentionally to increase lead quality
The idea in one line: add a short, seemingly unnecessary step to filter out casual visitors and surface higher-intent leads.
Why marketers argue about it
Friction is taboo - reduce it and conversion should rise. But some products suffer from low-quality leads that waste sales resources. Intentionally introducing friction (a clarifying question, a micro-quiz, or a “choose your use case” step) can focus the funnel on serious prospects. This is divisive because it sacrifices volume for lead quality.
How to run it in Crazy Egg
- Use heatmaps to identify the highest-leakage entry points and form fields users abandon.
- Create a variant that inserts a single short question or a dropdown during the conversion flow (e.g., “What’s your company size?”).
- Use Crazy Egg recordings to see how users interact with the extra step and Confetti to tag who completes it.
- Measure pipeline velocity and lead-to-customer rates, not just form submission volume.
How to measure
- Primary metrics - lead quality (qualified leads), SQL rate, pipeline conversion rate.
- Secondary metrics - number of leads, cost per qualified lead, sales time saved.
Pros
- Can dramatically reduce wasted sales time.
- Forces better qualification earlier.
Cons
- Reduces raw lead volume.
- If done clumsily, harms brand perception.
Ethics & UX
Be transparent - don’t disguise questions to deceive. If you use the friction to price-filter or upsell, make the purpose clear.
Example
An enterprise software company added a one-question qualifier in the demo request flow. Leads dropped 38% but qualified leads increased 70%, and sales rep time per closed deal dropped noticeably.
Tip 3 - Gamify micro-behaviors with Confetti and overlays to artificially boost engagement
The idea in one line: reward tiny interactions with celebratory UI (Confetti) and short overlays to create momentum.
Why marketers argue about it
Some marketers love the psychological nudge of a small reward. Others see it as manipulation-superficial engagement that doesn’t reflect true interest.
How to run it in Crazy Egg
- Use Confetti to tag a micro-behavior you want to encourage (e.g., clicking an info tooltip, watching a short product clip).
- Configure an overlay (or a subtle modal) to appear after the micro-action - a short congratulatory message plus a next-step CTA.
- Use recordings to watch whether the gamified nudge leads to deeper actions or just quick clicks.
How to measure
- Primary metrics - downstream conversion after the micro-behavior, long-term engagement metrics.
- Secondary metrics - repeat visits, feature adoption.
Pros
- Can create a sense of progress and increase feature adoption.
- Often low-friction to test and revert.
Cons
- Can inflate superficial metrics (clicks, time on page) without meaningful lift.
- Risk of annoying repeat users if overused.
Ethics & UX
Avoid dark patterns. Rewards should be genuine cues of progress, not tricks to pull people into unwanted actions. Keep the messaging honest and the overlay dismissible.
Example
An e-commerce test added confetti when users added items to cart and then showed a tiny overlay pointing to “recommended bundles.” Cart additions rose, but average order value didn’t - indicating the confetti encouraged the behavior but didn’t change purchase intent.
Tip 4 - Use session recordings to craft persona-specific omission (hide features for segments)
The idea in one line: use Crazy Egg recordings and segments to identify user personas and selectively hide or show features based on observed behavior.
Why marketers argue about it
Personalization is standard. Omission (removing features/choices for a segment) is contentious because it introduces unequal experiences. Critics worry about gatekeeping features based on inferred behavior. Proponents argue that less choice simplifies decision-making and improves conversion for targeted segments.
How to run it in Crazy Egg
- Collect recordings and build segments using Crazy Egg’s filtering (by referral, device, clicked elements, etc.).
- Analyze recordings to infer clear persona signals (e.g., product-researchers vs. buyers).
- Build test variants that hide or surface different modules for each persona - for example, hide complex pricing tables from onboarding-focused visitors and show a streamlined CTA instead.
- Use deterministic or probabilistic targeting via your tag manager or A/B tool to serve the variants.
How to measure
- Primary metrics - conversion rate for each persona, retention and satisfaction by persona.
- Secondary metrics - feature usage, support tickets.
Pros
- Increases relevance and reduces cognitive load for targeted visitors.
- Can boost conversion without changing the entire site.
Cons
- Risk of creating a second-class experience for certain users.
- If persona inference is wrong, you may hide useful options from people who need them.
Ethics & UX
Keep opt-in and control. Consider showing a small toggle like “Show advanced pricing” so visitors can reveal omitted content themselves. Be wary of hiding legally required information (terms, refunds, pricing where regulation requires disclosure).
Example
A B2B marketplace hid complex API documentation for users who previously visited only the pricing page, showing a simpler “request demo” CTA instead. Demo requests rose, but a subset of developers complained their needs were obscured - the team added a “for developers” link to preserve discovery.
Tip 5 - Test conversion-by-omission: hide price or a core feature for a segment to increase form submissions
The idea in one line: intentionally omit price or remove a core feature from the landing variant to force prospects to contact sales or submit a lead form.
Why marketers argue about it
This is the most polarizing tip. Advocates say hiding price can convert price-sensitive shoppers into leads that sales can qualify (and perhaps upsell). Critics say it’s the opposite of transparent marketing and erodes trust.
How to run it in Crazy Egg
- Identify pages where price disclosure correlates with self-service purchases rather than sales conversations.
- Segment visitors who are likely enterprise buyers (referrer, IP range, company size inferred from form data or integrations) and serve them a variant that omits public pricing, replacing it with “contact us for pricing.”
- Use recordings to verify behavior - do these visitors attempt to find price elsewhere? Do they click contact CTAs more?
- Measure the entire funnel - leads created, qualification rate, deal size, time to close.
How to measure
- Primary metrics - qualified lead rate, average deal value, close rate.
- Secondary metrics - site trust signals (support tickets mentioning price), bounce from pricing-seeking pages.
Pros
- Can increase high-value, high-touch leads.
- Forces sales-led revenue where appropriate.
Cons
- Can alienate self-serve buyers and smaller customers.
- Perceived opacity damages brand in the long run.
Ethics & legal
Be transparent where required. Some jurisdictions require price display or fairness in commerce communications. Check local laws and your industry norms.
Example
A pricing-hiding experiment increased demo requests by 27% and average deal size by 18% - but some existing customers were upset when they couldn’t find pricing during research. The company solved this by segmenting: self-serve channels retained public pricing while enterprise channels saw the contact-first flow.
Measurement checklist for controversial experiments
- Define primary and secondary metrics before launching. Don’t chase short-term vanity lifts.
- Pre-calculate sample size using standard tools (https://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/sample-size.html).
- Set a minimum test run time (usually at least 2 full business cycles). Longer for retention-sensitive outcomes.
- Use Crazy Egg recordings as qualitative validation, not just proof of correlation.
- Track downstream signals - churn, returns, customer satisfaction.
Privacy and legal guardrails
- Recordings can capture PII. Mask or exclude fields that collect sensitive data. Refer to Crazy Egg docs for recording controls (https://help.crazyegg.com/).
- Check local privacy laws (GDPR, CCPA). If you record EU users, you may need consent. See a GDPR overview here: https://gdpr.eu/.
- Maintain an internal experiment playbook that lists what you will never test (e.g., hiding refund policy, deliberately collecting sensitive health or financial data during recordings without consent).
Final thoughts - what divides marketers and what wins
These five tips push a central tension: optimize for immediate conversion or optimize for long-term trust. They force choices about volume vs. quality, clarity vs. persuasion, transparency vs. nudging. You can run any of these safely with Crazy Egg, but don’t treat qualitative wins as gospel. Validate with quantitative tests and watch downstream metrics.
Most controversial is also most powerful: deliberate omission (Tip 5) can change the nature of your business - from self-service to sales-led - overnight. That’s not an optimization tweak. It’s strategic.
If you run one experiment from this list, choose one small, time-boxed test with clear success/failure criteria, and build guardrails to protect trust and privacy.
References
- Crazy Egg features: https://www.crazyegg.com/features/
- Crazy Egg help center: https://help.crazyegg.com/
- GDPR primer: https://gdpr.eu/
- A/B test sample-size calculator: https://www.evanmiller.org/ab-testing/sample-size.html



